State v. Don Jacob Havatone
Arizona Supreme Court
1Concurring in part, dissenting in part
PELANDER, V.C.J.,
joined by BRUTINEL, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part.
¶ 38 For almost fifty years, Arizona’s “implied consent” law has specifically and expressly allowed law enforcement to obtain for testing a blood sample of a DUI suspect who is unconscious. A.R.S. § 28-1321(0); see former A.R.S. § 28-691(0) (1969 Ariz. Sess. Laws ch. 41, § 1). Pursuant to that statutory authority, when the events in this case occurred in September 2012, police officers (and for that matter a conscientious police department or its legal counsel) would have reasonably believed that they could…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Brigham City v. StuartSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Scott v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.