Legal Opinion
NOELLIEN v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided May 19, 2009No. A09A1145PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ANDREWS, Presiding Judge.
On appeal from his conviction for drug possession, Solomon Noellien argues that the trial court erred when it limited argument and that trial counsel was ineffective. We affirm.
“On appeal from a criminal conviction, we view the evidence in the light most favorable to the verdict, with the defendant no longer enjoying a presumption of innocence.” Reese v. State, 270 Ga. App. 522, 523 (607 SE2d 165) (2004). We neither weigh the evidence nor judge the credibility of witnesses, but determine only whether, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Suggs v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2000
- Reese v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2004
- Braithwaite v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2002
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Colzie v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2011
- Kritlow v. the StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2016
- SEALS v. the STATE.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2019
- LANHAM v. the STATE.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2018
- Walker v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2011
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.