Legal Opinion

Cline v. Farmers' Oil Mill

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided July 19, 1909No. 7247PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Before Mrmminger, "J., Cherokee, March, 1909. Action by H. S. Cline against Farmers’ Oil Mill. The reasons given by the trial Judge for refusing the motion for a new trial are: “The action was upon an instrument in writing in the nature of a promissory note, of which the following is a copy: 'Gaffney, S. C., August 24, 1908. The Farmers’ Oil Mill promises to pay to H. S. Cline one hundred and fifty dollars for one bay mare mule, by September 15, 1908. (Signed) Farmers’ Oil…

Read the full summary

Before Mrmminger, "J., Cherokee, March, 1909. Action by H. S. Cline against Farmers’ Oil Mill. The reasons given by the trial Judge for refusing the motion for a new trial are: “The action was upon an instrument in writing in the nature of a promissory note, of which the following is a copy: 'Gaffney, S. C., August 24, 1908. The Farmers’ Oil Mill promises to pay to H. S. Cline one hundred and fifty dollars for one bay mare mule, by September 15, 1908. (Signed) Farmers’ Oil Mill, by R. C. Sarratt, president and treasurer.’ “The answer admits the instrument, and sets up as a defense that the…

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Gary.

The facts are thus stated in the record:

“This is an action on an alleged promissory note, of which a copy is set out as an exhibit herein. On the trial of the case before Judge R. W. Memminger, after plaintiff had proved the execution and delivery of the note sued on, the defendant’s attorney commenced to cross-examine the plaintiff, who was a witness, on the stand, with reference to the matters set up in the answer of the defendant as a defense, whereupon the attorney for the plaintiff objected to the questions and answers, on the…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Arthur v. BrownSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1912
  2. Stalnaker v. TolbertSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1922
  3. Asbill Motor Co. v. ChaplinSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1922
  4. Armour Fertilizer Works v. HymanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1922
  5. Brown v. HuskampSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1927

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API