People v. Mull
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum:
Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon a jury verdict of burglary in the second degree (Penal Law § 140.25 [2]). Contrary to defendant’s contention, Supreme Court’s Sandoval ruling did not constitute an abuse of discretion. Defendant’s prior conviction of false personation pursuant to Penal Law § 190.23 bore directly on his credibility, inasmuch as it involved an act of individual dishonesty by him (see People v Smikle, 82 AD3d 1697, 1697 [2011], lv denied 17 NY3d 801 [2011]; see generally People v Sandoval, 34 NY2d 371, 377 [1974]; People v Arguinzoni, 48 AD3d 1239,…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- People v. BleakleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- People v. ContesNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- People v. DanielsonNew York Court of Appeals · 2007
- People v. CrimminsNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- People v. . MolineuxNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- People v. RumphAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- People v. ArnoldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- People v. IrvinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- People v. WhitfieldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- People v. MatthewsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.