Legal Opinion

Steffen v. Fox

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided January 2, 1894PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from the St. Louis City Circuit Cowt. — Hon. Jacob Klein, Judge.-,

1Opinion of the CourtRombauer, P. J.

— Tbe action is one upon a special tax bill for constructing a granitoid sidewalk in front of tbe property of tbe defendants on che north•east corner of Eighth and Market streets in tbe city of *10St. Louis. The petition sets out the various ordinances of the city under which the work was done, the completion of the work and the issuance of the-special tax bill to the plaintiff.. The substantial defense made by the answer is-that the work done was illegal and void, because done-in contravention of an ordinance of the city providing-among other things:

“Hereafter no. sidewalk shall be constructed,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Cole v. SkrainkaSupreme Court of Missouri · 1891
  2. Sheehan v. OwenSupreme Court of Missouri · 1884
  3. City of St. Joseph v. AnthonySupreme Court of Missouri · 1860
  4. Burke v. City of KansasMissouri Court of Appeals · 1889
  5. Keane v. CushingMissouri Court of Appeals · 1884

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Steffen v. FoxSupreme Court of Missouri · 1894
  2. Meyer v. BobbMissouri Court of Appeals · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API