Legal Opinion · Dissent

George Fabe, Superintendent of Insurance, State of Ohio v. United States Department of the Treasury Mitchell A. Levine, Assistant Commissioner

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided July 17, 1991No. 90-3364Published

1DissentNathaniel R. Jones, Circuit Judge

The majority correctly phrases the narrow issue presented to us for review as “whether the Ohio insurance liquidation priority statute is a state law regulating the ‘business of insurance’ within the meaning of the McCarran-Ferguson Act.” Maj. op. at 343. In my view, however, the majority attaches too broad an interpretation to the phrase “the business of insurance”, and as a result incorrectly concludes that Ohio’s liquidation priority scheme is not subject to federal preemption. Such a holding fails to comport with relevant case-law from other Courts of Appeals and the U.S. Supreme Court. I…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Union Labor Life Insurance v. PirenoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Idaho ex rel. Soward v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
  3. Gordon v. United States Department of the TreasuryDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1987
  4. Gordon v. United States Department Of The TreasuryCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API