Pittmon v. Flowers
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
CASE 83. — ACTION BY R. PITTMON AGAINST VICTORY FLOWERS AND ANOTHER TO CANCEL A DEED.— Appeal from Clinton Circuit Court. M. L. Jarvis, Circuit Judge. Judgment for defendants, plaintiffs appeal AUTHORITIES CITED. As to delivery of need. (Colyer v. Hyden, &e., 15 Ky. Law Rep. 101; Martin v. Bates' Guardian, &c., 20 Ky. Law Rep, 1798; Koger, &c., v. Koger, &c.,- 29 Ky. Law Rep. 236. AUTHORITIES CITED.
Read the full summary
CASE 83. — ACTION BY R. PITTMON AGAINST VICTORY FLOWERS AND ANOTHER TO CANCEL A DEED.— Appeal from Clinton Circuit Court. M. L. Jarvis, Circuit Judge. Judgment for defendants, plaintiffs appeal AUTHORITIES CITED. As to delivery of need. (Colyer v. Hyden, &e., 15 Ky. Law Rep. 101; Martin v. Bates' Guardian, &c., 20 Ky. Law Rep, 1798; Koger, &c., v. Koger, &c.,- 29 Ky. Law Rep. 236. AUTHORITIES CITED. Colyer v. Hyden, et al., 21 S. W. (Ky.) 868; Tiedeman on Real Property (2d ed.) 798'; Tiedeman on Real Property (2d ed.) 814; Akers- v. Shoemaker, et al., 102 S. W. iKy.) 842; Civil Code ol…
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court by
Judge Nunn
Affirming.
On the2d day of June, 1903, appellant, R. Pittmon, made and executed a deed of conveyance to appellee Jasper M. Flowers of about 80 acres of land, worth from .$600 to $800. The. only consideration named in the deed was “love and affection.” The deed was prepared in the usual form. At the time of the conveyance, Jasper M. Flowers was.five years of age. Appellant, in the month 'of November, 1907, filed this action, by which he sought.to have the deed canceled, and to recover possession of the land, which the child and its mother, Victory Flowers, were…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Kirby v. HuletteCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917
- Cates v. CatesCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1913
- White v. HoggeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1956
- Litteral v. AngelCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1946