Parry v. Colorado Board of Corrections

Plaintipps in error are hereinafter referred to as the architects and defendant in error as the board.

The parties contracted concerning- plans for a building which the board “intended to erect * * * at' the state hospital at Pueblo.” The contract provided for arbitration of “all questions in dispute.” There was a dispute, a pretended arbitration, and judgment therein entered in the district court. The board moved to set aside that judgment and the motion was granted. To review that' action the architects prosecute this writ.

The board has general control of said state hospital. O. L. 1921, p.…