Legal Opinion

Mayflower, Inc. v. Suskind

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided May 14, 1959No. 58-591PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CARROLL, CHAS., Chief Judge.

Appellant, who was defendant below, seeks reversal of a judgment on a promissory note, which was entered against it in the amount of $13,175.13 plus attorney’s fees and costs in the circuit court in Dade County.

The defendant’s answer included a counterclaim asserting want of consideration. That defense, mistakenly included in the counterclaim, was entitled to be treated as though it had properly been set forth in the answer as an affirmative defense.1

The trial court granted plaintiff’s motion for judgment on the pleadings as to liability, *395with the resultant effect…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Paradise Pools v. GenauerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1958
  2. Towles v. AzarSupreme Court of Florida · 1933

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Barnes v. Boulevard National Bank of MiamiDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1960
  2. Am. Hous. Systems Corp. v. Country Club, Etc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977
  3. Barentine v. ClementsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1976
  4. Chase Manhattan Bank v. MargerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966
  5. Miami Gray Line Boats, Inc. v. Dade CountyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1967

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API