Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Corey v. . Hooker

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 22, 1916Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partClark, C. J.

Civil action upon exceptions to report of referee. The court overruled all plaintiffs' exceptions and sustained defendants' exceptions, and made findings of fact and law and rendered judgment accordingly. The plaintiffs appealed. In this action plaintiffs seek to perpetually restrain the defendants from foreclosing certain mortgages under powers of the therein contained, executed to Z. V. Hooker and F. C. Harding and assigned by them to S. T. Hooker. An injunction to the hearing was granted, a reference had, and the case is now presented upon the facts and conclusions of law embodied in the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Simonton v. . LanierSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1874
  2. Owens v. WrightSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
  3. Lindsay v. United States Savings & Loan Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1899
  4. Churchill v. . TurnageSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1898
  5. Ballinger v. . EdwardsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1847

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API