Legal Opinion
Ruttonjee v. Frame
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 4, 1923PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Finch, J.:
The action is brought to recover damages for failure to accept and pay for goods sold by plaintiffs to the defendants. On *355November 27, 1918, the plaintiffs shipped to New York 1,700 bales of cloves by delivering same on board a certain vessel and receiving bills of lading dated that day. Plaintiffs then cabled to their agent in New York to sell said cloves, and on December 6, 1918, a c. i. f. contract of sale was entered into by said agent for plaintiffs’ account with the defendants for 600 bales of said cloves, providing, in so far as material, as follows:
“ M. Arachtingi.
“ Broker…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Rickerson v. . Hartford Fire Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1896
- Standard Casing Co. v. . California Casing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1922
- Moore v. . PotterNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
- Seaver v. . Lindsay Light Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1922
- Lewis v. . GreiderNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Ronrico Corp. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1941
- Cundill v. A. W. Millhauser Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1930