Wright v. State

David Wright appeals a final order denying his rule 3.850 motion for post-conviction relief. The motion alleged two grounds for relief: (1) that the state presented insufficient evidence to prove that he possessed and had knowledge of the cocaine that he was charged with trafficking, and (2) that his appellate counsel was ineffective for failing to raise on direct appeal the sufficiency of the evidence presented at trial on possession.

We affirm the circuit court’s denial of the first ground for relief challenging the sufficiency of evidence presented at trial. *119However, we vacate the portion…