Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Florida Department of Transportation v. McFadden

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided June 2, 1983No. 82-1087Published

1ConcurrenceOrfinger, Chief Judge

Because Lake County v. Friedel, 387 So.2d 514 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980), is a decision of this court and clearly controls the result here, I am obligated to concur in the conclusion reached by the majority. However, because I believe that Friedel’s reliance on Carlile v. Game and Fresh Water Commission, 354 So.2d 362 (Fla.1977), is misplaced and that its result is therefore incorrect, I would dissent were I free to do so.

Carlile reiterates the common-law privilege of the State or one of its agencies to be sued in the county of its principal headquarters, absent waiver or exception. In Car-lile, the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Carlile v. GAME AND FRESH WATER FISH COM'NSupreme Court of Florida · 1977
  2. Lakeland Ideal Farm & Drainage District v. MitchellSupreme Court of Florida · 1929
  3. Lake County v. FriedelDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
  4. Grice v. Bd. of County Com'rs of Madison CountyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
  5. Medina v. Florida Dept. of Transp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API