Florida Department of Transportation v. McFadden
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1ConcurrenceOrfinger, Chief Judge
Because Lake County v. Friedel, 387 So.2d 514 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980), is a decision of this court and clearly controls the result here, I am obligated to concur in the conclusion reached by the majority. However, because I believe that Friedel’s reliance on Carlile v. Game and Fresh Water Commission, 354 So.2d 362 (Fla.1977), is misplaced and that its result is therefore incorrect, I would dissent were I free to do so.
Carlile reiterates the common-law privilege of the State or one of its agencies to be sued in the county of its principal headquarters, absent waiver or exception. In Car-lile, the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Carlile v. GAME AND FRESH WATER FISH COM'NSupreme Court of Florida · 1977
- Lakeland Ideal Farm & Drainage District v. MitchellSupreme Court of Florida · 1929
- Lake County v. FriedelDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
- Grice v. Bd. of County Com'rs of Madison CountyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
- Medina v. Florida Dept. of Transp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.