Legal Opinion · Dissent

Howard v. Dallas Morning News, Inc.

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided April 1, 1996No. 95-938Published

1DissentRobert L. Brown, Justice

The central issue in this case is whether David Mitchell was an employee or an independent contractor of the Dallas Morning News. The threshold determination in such cases is whether Mitchell had the authority to act for the publishing company. See, e.g., McMahan v. Berry, 319 Ark. 88, 890 S.W.2d 242 (1994); Pledger v. Troll Book Clubs, Inc., 316 Ark. 195, 871 S.W.2d 389 (1994); Jumper v. L & M Transp., Inc., 296 Ark. 319, 756 S.W.2d 901 (1988); Johnson v. Timber Corp., 295 Ark. 622, 752 S.W.2d 241, set aside on rehearing on other grounds, 295 Ark. 663-A, 758 S.W.2d 415 (1988); Schuster’s,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Evans v. WhiteSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1985
  2. Pledger v. Troll Book Clubs, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
  3. Blankenship v. OverholtSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
  4. Schuster's, Inc. v. WhiteheadSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987
  5. Johnson Timber Corp. v. SturdivantSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API