Legal Opinion

Crowell's Appeal

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 15, 1834PublishedCited by 4 opinions

APPEAL from the decree of the orphan’s court of Cumberland county. The court in their opinion state all the facts which are necessary to a full understanding of the principles determined in the case.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Rogers, J.

This is an appeal from the guardianship account of *296William M’Canallish, who was the guardian of Mary Lecky, now Mary Crowell, a minor daughter of Alexander Lecky. The account was presented to the orphan’s court of Cumberland county, for confirmation. Exceptions were filed to the account, whereupon the court, by consent of parties, appointed auditors to hear and decide upon the exceptions. The auditors made a report; which the court confirmed. Crowell and wife appealed from the decree, and have filed the same exceptions as below, all of which…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. SeelyeIllinois Supreme Court · 1892
  2. In re Estate of KincaidCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Eichelberger v. SmyserSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1839
  4. In re Estate of KincaidCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API