Legal Opinion

State v. Currie

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided September 27, 2013No. 108,612PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Arnold-Burger, P.J.:

Cleophus C. Currie appeals his sentence, arguing that the sentencing court erred by misinterpreting K.S.A. 2012 Supp. 21-6804(p), finding that the statute prevented the court from granting probation in Currie’s case. The State concedes that the statute allows probation, but the State asserts that because Currie was given a presumptive sentence, this court does not have jurisdiction to hear this appeal. We find that because the court misinterpreted its authority in the case by denying probation on the sole basis that it believed such action was not allowed by the statute,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. EllmakerSupreme Court of Kansas · 2009
  2. State v. ComanSupreme Court of Kansas · 2012
  3. State v. WarrenSupreme Court of Kansas · 2013
  4. State v. ChesbroCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2006

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. MurphyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
  2. State v. MurphyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API