Legal Opinion
Keystone Commercial Properties, Inc. v. City of Pittsburgh
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided November 26, 1975No. 171PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
EAGEN, Justice.
On June 4, 1970, the City of Pittsburgh (hereinafter City) notified Louise and Bessie Caplan, the owners of a building at 1229 Fifth Avenue, Pittsburgh, that the building was in a dangerous condition 1 2 and was therefore condemned. The property was also posted as condemned on June 4, 1970. The notice informed the owners that they had thirty days in which to remedy the condition or to appeal the condemnation order to the courts. If the owners failed to take action, then the City would proceed to demolish the building. See Act of May 13, 1915, P.L. 297, as…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Fantony v. FantonySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1956
- Anne E. Miles v. District of Columbia, a Municipal Corporation, and John A. TaylorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975
- Stratford Arms, Inc. v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
- Miles v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1973
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Bigley v. Unity Auto Parts, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Commonwealth v. BorrielloCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- Herrit v. Code Management Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- City of Pittsburgh v. PivirottoCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Mente Chevrolet Oldsmobile, Inc. v. GmacDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2010
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.