Legal Opinion

Coman v. Coman

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 20, 1949PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSteuer, J.

Defendant is appealing from an order directing payment of alimony and counsel fees. Plaintiff has served a notice of cross appeal. Defendant rejected this notice and this motion seeks to compel its acceptance. The first question is when the thirty-day period in which plaintiff might have appealed starts to run. The order was made and entered on March 30,1949. While the record is not quite as clear as it might be it appears that this entry was by the court pursuant to section 1557-a of the Civil Practice Act, after submission of a proposed order. Plaintiff served the order on April 1, 1949. As…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Manhattan Storage & Warehouse Co. v. LillyNew York Court of Appeals · 1949
  2. Anthony v. SchofieldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1943
  3. People ex rel. Manhattan Storage & Warehouse Co. v. LillyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ralston v. BlumNew York Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Stevens v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API