Legal Opinion

State v. Hammame

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided April 9, 2008No. CA 07-163PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Robert J. Gladwin, Judge.

The State of Arkansas appeals the Carroll County Circuit Court’s dismissal of its in rem forfeiture action as to a 1996 Toyota Canary, which was seized from Adam Hammame and Susan Hammame. The State contends on appeal that the circuit court misinterpreted Ark. Code Ann. § 5-64-505 (Repl. 2005), by concluding that the sheriffs office was a party to the forfeiture action under that statute, and therefore, could not effect service pursuant to Arkansas Rule of Civil Procedure 4(c)(1) (2006). We reverse and remand for proceedings consistent with this opinion.

An in rem…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Forrest City MacHine Works, Inc. v. LyonsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
  2. Arkansas Highway Police v. Crittenden County Prosecuting Attorney's OfficeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
  3. Ligon v. StewartSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2007
  4. Matter of AllenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
  5. Ark. State Highway Comm. v. PerrinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1966

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. MolnarCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
  2. United States v. Miklos MolnarCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API