Legal Opinion

Pech v. Estate of Tavarez

Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District

Decided July 31, 2003No. 13-01-841-CVPublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Opinion by Justice RODRIGUEZ.

This is a medical malpractice action. Appellant, Mary Ann Barnes Pech, sued appellee, the Estate of Dr. Vicente Tava-rez, Jr., deceased (the Estate), for malpractice arising from a surgery performed by Dr. Tavarez. The Estate moved for traditional summary judgment asserting Pech was barred by limitations under the two-year statute on medical malpractice actions, and, alternately, under the open courts doctrine. The trial court granted the Estate’s motion and dismissed the case. By three points, Pech contends the trial court erred in dismissing the suit in…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Nixon v. Mr. Property Management Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
  2. City of Houston v. Clear Creek Basin AuthorityTexas Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Cathey v. BoothTexas Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Crown Life Insurance Company v. CasteelTexas Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Natividad v. Alexsis, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1994

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Garrod Investments, Inc. v. Schlegel, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2004
  2. Boyd v. KallamCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2004
  3. Coco v. Port of Corpus Christi Authority, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2004
  4. Erickson v. Heim-Hall, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2005
  5. Aaron A. Joiner v. Pactiv Corporation, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2005

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API