In re the Estate of Tividar
New York Surrogate's Court
1Opinion of the Court
Rubenstein, S.
Petitioners move to strike out respondent’s answer and for summary judgment, pursuant to rule 113 of the Rules of Civil Practice, directing the executor to deliver to them ten United States Defense Bonds, each of which is payable upon testatrix’ death to beneficiaries named thereon.
Respondent, who is the sole beneficiary, residuary legatee and executor under testatrix’ will, admits that he has possession of the bonds but asserts that there is a question of ownership because testatrix listed the same bonds in her will as a bequest to him. It is further contended that if the bonds…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Ruddy v. RossiSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- United States v. JanowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- United States v. SacksSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- In re the Accounting of MundNew York Surrogate's Court · 1945
- In re the Estate of OwensNew York Surrogate's Court · 1941
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In re Syracuse UniversityNew York Supreme Court · 1955
- In re the Accounting of BarlettaNew York Surrogate's Court · 1956
- In re the Estate of SimonNew York Surrogate's Court · 1967
- In re the Accounting of TouchstoneNew York Surrogate's Court · 1959