Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Ryan v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided October 26, 2011No. 3D10-1709Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partEmas, J.

I join the majority in affirming without discussion the conviction. However, I dissent from the majority’s affirmance of the sentence. I believe we should vacate the sentence and remand to the trial court for resentencing before a different judge. Where it is reasonably evident that the trial court, in determining the appropriate sentence, considered at least in part a defendant’s lack of remorse (as opposed to a court’s determination that a defendant’s claim of remorse has not been established 1), the sentence should be vacated and a *15new sentencing proceeding held before a different judge.…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Hubler v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
  2. Hannum v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009
  3. A.S. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
  4. K.N.M. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
  5. K.Y.L. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API