Legal Opinion

Edwards v. DeSimone

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided November 14, 1969Published

1Opinion of the CourtPaolino, J.

After we filed our decision in Edwards v. DeSimone, 105 R. I. 335, 252 A.2d 327, the defendants Audrey Hoffman Clinton and Iris Sellar Veeder filed a motion for leave to file a petition for partial reconsideration of our decision in that case. We denied the motion but entered an order granting the parties permission to reargue the limited question raised in their motion. Edwards v. DeSimone, 105 R. I. 787, 253 A.2d 626.

The question presented is whether Article Eleventh of the will of Maude A. K. Wetmore and Article Tenth of the will of Edith Malvina K. Wetmore should apply to the disposition…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Peckham v. NewtonSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1886
  2. Rhode Island Hospital Trust Company v. VotolatoSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1967
  3. Industrial National Bank v. DrysdaleSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1956
  4. Edwards v. DeSimoneSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1969
  5. MacDonald v. ManningSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1968

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API