Legal Opinion

Finnegan v. Detroit Free Press Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 28, 1889PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to Wayne. (Brevoort, J.) Case. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion of Sherwood, C. J.

1Opinion of the CourtMorse, J.

The only error that I can find in this case is the refusal of the court to give the third request of defendant, to wit:

“If you find that at, and for a length of time prior to, th.e publication of the article sued upon, the plaintiff was universally or generally known as 'John D. Finnegan,^ and not as merely ‘John Finnegan/ and that such initial letter, ‘D/ had been adopted by him expressly to distinguish him from persons known as 'John Finnegan/ then this article sued upon will not be presumed to have had reference to the plaintiff; and, as there is no evidence in the case that he. is the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bailey v. Kalamazoo Publishing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1879
  2. Mix v. WoodwardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1837
  3. Smawley v. StarkIndiana Supreme Court · 1857
  4. Russell v. KellyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
  5. Gidney v. BlakeNew York Supreme Court · 1814

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Clair v. Battle Creek Journal Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Lake Havasu Estates, Inc. v. Reader's Digest Ass'nDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1977
  3. MacFadden's Publications, Inc. v. TurnerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API