Legal Opinion
Finnegan v. Detroit Free Press Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided December 28, 1889PublishedCited by 3 opinions
Error to Wayne. (Brevoort, J.) Case. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion of Sherwood, C. J.
1Opinion of the CourtMorse, J.
The only error that I can find in this case is the refusal of the court to give the third request of defendant, to wit:
“If you find that at, and for a length of time prior to, th.e publication of the article sued upon, the plaintiff was universally or generally known as 'John D. Finnegan,^ and not as merely ‘John Finnegan/ and that such initial letter, ‘D/ had been adopted by him expressly to distinguish him from persons known as 'John Finnegan/ then this article sued upon will not be presumed to have had reference to the plaintiff; and, as there is no evidence in the case that he. is the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Bailey v. Kalamazoo Publishing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1879
- Mix v. WoodwardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1837
- Smawley v. StarkIndiana Supreme Court · 1857
- Russell v. KellyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
- Gidney v. BlakeNew York Supreme Court · 1814
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Clair v. Battle Creek Journal Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1912
- Lake Havasu Estates, Inc. v. Reader's Digest Ass'nDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1977
- MacFadden's Publications, Inc. v. TurnerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936