Legal Opinion
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Caywood
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided November 15, 1989No. 89-1093PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Per curiam
We agree with the board’s findings and recommendation. Accordingly, we suspend respondent from the practice of law for two years but stay the suspension pending his successful completion of two years of monitored probation. Costs taxed to respondent.
Judgment accordingly.
Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.
2Cited by3 opinions
- Cuyahoga Cty. Bar Assn. v. CaywoodOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- Disciplinary Counsel v. CaywoodOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. CaywoodOhio Supreme Court · 1993