Legal Opinion

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Caywood

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1989No. 89-1093PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

We agree with the board’s findings and recommendation. Accordingly, we suspend respondent from the practice of law for two years but stay the suspension pending his successful completion of two years of monitored probation. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cuyahoga Cty. Bar Assn. v. CaywoodOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Disciplinary Counsel v. CaywoodOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. CaywoodOhio Supreme Court · 1993