Legal Opinion

Franklin v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 11, 1997No. A97A0199PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Eldridge, Judge.

Voyage Franklin appeals his Cobb County conviction for possession of cocaine. We affirm as follows:

1. Appellant first contends that the stop of his vehicle was a mere pretext, unsupported by reasonable, articulable suspicion. Thus, appellant contends that the fruits of the subsequent consensual search, a rock of crack cocaine and two crack pipes, should have been suppressed as derived from the illegal stop. We do not agree.

The record demonstrates that while a BOLO (“be on the look out”) had been placed on appellant’s vehicle for possible involvement in drug activity,…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Jones v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1988
  2. Medlock v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1993
  3. Jordan v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
  4. Coney v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1991
  5. Flowers v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Boykin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
  2. State v. DickersonSupreme Court of Georgia · 2001
  3. Sweeney v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
  4. Herieia v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2009
  5. Pena v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API