Franklin v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Eldridge, Judge.
Voyage Franklin appeals his Cobb County conviction for possession of cocaine. We affirm as follows:
1. Appellant first contends that the stop of his vehicle was a mere pretext, unsupported by reasonable, articulable suspicion. Thus, appellant contends that the fruits of the subsequent consensual search, a rock of crack cocaine and two crack pipes, should have been suppressed as derived from the illegal stop. We do not agree.
The record demonstrates that while a BOLO (“be on the look out”) had been placed on appellant’s vehicle for possible involvement in drug activity,…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Jones v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1988
- Medlock v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1993
- Jordan v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
- Coney v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1991
- Flowers v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Boykin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
- State v. DickersonSupreme Court of Georgia · 2001
- Sweeney v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
- Herieia v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2009
- Pena v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.