Legal Opinion

Puckett v. Hetzer

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided June 11, 1910No. 16,582PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Kearny district court; William H. Thompson, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

BURCH, J.:

In April, 1903, F. C. Puckett took judgment by default quieting his title to the land in controversy. Service was obtained by publication. The proceedings, including the notice, gave the defendant’s name as Joseph Remer. In July, 1908, A. R. Hetzer obtained a quitclaim deed of the land from Joseph Renner, and in August following moved to vacate the judgment as void so far as it affected the interest of his grantor. The motion was denied, and Hetzer appeals.

The notice only need be considered. If the proper party were duly served other mistakes…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Miltonvale State Bank v. KuhnleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1893
  2. Entrekin v. ChambersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1873

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Evans v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1927
  2. State ex rel. Blake v. DunnSupreme Court of Kansas · 1925
  3. Strasser v. RessNebraska Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Nichols v. NicholsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1927
  5. Bennett v. WinegarNebraska Supreme Court · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API