In re "H" Children
New York Family Court
1Opinion of the CourtM. Michael Potoker, J.
Petitioner’s charge of child neglect under article 10 of the Family ¡Court Act is predicated on his wife’s living in the same household with their five minor children and a paramour.
The facts are conceded. On September 13, 1970 respondent left the marital home with her five minor children, whose ages range from 5 to 13, and took up residence with her paramour in his one-family home. The children occupy two rooms on the upper floors while respondent and her paramour, with whom she has been intimate, share a bedroom on a lower floor. Respondent stated that she has instituted an action for…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Maynard v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Finlay v. FinlayNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
- People Ex Rel. Wallace v. LabrenzIllinois Supreme Court · 1952
- Bunim v. BunimNew York Court of Appeals · 1949
- Goldson v. GoldsonOregon Supreme Court · 1951
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In re ForemanNew York City Family Court · 1973
- In re Arlene D.New York City Family Court · 1972
- S. v. J.New York Supreme Court · 1975