Pacific Coast Automobile Ass'n v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
This isa petition for a writ of prohibition. The principal contention of respondents seems to be that the record made is insufficient to support the proceeding. To some extent this contention has merit. However, by a somewhat equivocal return to the alternative writ and more expressly at the hearing upon said return, the facts were agreed upon and the record supplemented sufficient to squarely present the issue.
In a certain action brought in the Superior Court of the State of California, in and for the City and County of San Francisco, wherein Theodore Hale et al. were plaintiffs…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Miller v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
- California Filter Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- Colyear v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hustead v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
- Kapelus v. Family Health FoundationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
- Mitchell v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972