Legal Opinion

The Roseville

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided June 13, 1935No. 7328PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

CUSHMAN, District Judge (after stating the facts as above).

Unless by the Treaty of 1932 between the United States and Norway (47 Stat. part 2, pp. 2135-2159) a different intent is shown from that of the Treaty of July 4, 1827 (8 Stat. pp. 347-359), the stated exception should be sustained. The Taigen Maru (C. C. A.) 73 F.(2d) 922. Article 13 of the Treaty considered by the court in that case (8 Stat. p. 352), in part, provided : “The consuls, vice consuls, or commercial agents, or the persons duly authorized to supply their places, shall have the right, as such, to sit as judges and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Montello Salt Co. v. UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  2. The Taigen MaruCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1934

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Clymer v. WebsterSupreme Court of Vermont · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API