Legal Opinion

Elk County v. Earley

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 1, 1888No. 119PublishedCited by 2 opinions

APPEAL EROM THE DECREE OE THE COURT OE' COMMON PLEAS OE ELK COUNTY, IN EQUITY. No. 119 July Term 1887, Sup. Ct.; court below, No. 1 November Term 1885, C. P. in Equity.

Read the full summary

APPEAL EROM THE DECREE OE THE COURT OE' COMMON PLEAS OE ELK COUNTY, IN EQUITY. No. 119 July Term 1887, Sup. Ct.; court below, No. 1 November Term 1885, C. P. in Equity. On November 17, 1885, a bill in equity was filed in behalf of the county of Elk, by its commissioners, against C. R. Earley, Elizabeth Earley and James H. Hagerty, in which it was averred: That on or about November 5, 1848, John J. Ridgway, by deed duly proved and recorded, did grant and convey unto Timothy Ives, Jr., J. W. Guthrie and Z. H. Eddy, commissioners of the county of Elk, and their successors in office, the right to…

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion,

Mr. Justice Stekrett :

The learned master’s report, which was approved by the court below, contains such a clear and accurate statement of all the material facts of the case, and of the principles of law applicable to them, that, in connection with the opinion of the learned president of the Common Pleas, it may be adopted as an ample vindication of the decree. There appears to be nothing in the findings of fact or conclusions of law that requires special notice. The specifications of error are not sustained.

It is clear that under Mr. John J. Ridgway’s deed of November 5, 1843, the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bierbower's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1884

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Fisk v. MontgomerySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1869
  2. Fergus v. City of CoLumbus, Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Franklin County, Civil Division1898

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API