Legal Opinion · Dissent
Enpalm, Lcc v. Teitler Family Trust
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 30, 2008No. B194372Published
1Dissent
COOPER, P. J., Dissenting.
I respectfully dissent from the result reached by the majority in this case. I agree with the recitation of the general principles that govern the determination of the appropriate amount of attorney fees to be awarded pursuant to Civil Code section 1717.1 I agree that “[t]he trial court has broad discretion to determine the amount of a reasonable fee, and the award of such fees is governed by equitable principles. (PLCM Group, *779Inc. v. Drexler (2000) 22 Cal.4th 1084, 1094-1095 [95 Cal.Rptr.2d 198, 997 P.2d 511] (PLCM).)” (Maj. opn., ante, at p. 774.) I further agree…
2Cases cited62 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Hutto v. FinneySupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Newman v. Piggie Park Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- City of Detroit v. Grinnell Corporation, Manhattan-Ward, Incorporated v. Grinnell Corporation, 1225 Vine Street Building, Inc. v. Grinnell CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
- Deposit Guaranty National Bank v. RoperSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.