Legal Opinion

City of Louisville v. Heitkemper's Adminstratrix

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided March 15, 1916PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from Jefferson Circuit Court (Common Pleas Branch, First Division).

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Hurt

Affirming.. Bernard Heitkemper was an employe of the Arctic Ice Company, in the city of Louisville, and his duties *168were those of a “helper” upon a wagon engaged in delivering ice to the patrons of his employer. James Con-, ley was the driver of the wagon, and when it was in motion, Heitkemper stood upon a step, about one and a half feet from the ground, which was attached to the rear of the wagon, and secured his position by holding with his hands to some attachment upon the rear of the bed of the wagon. While engaged in the duties to which he was assigned, on…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. City of Louisville v. Hart's Admr.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1911
  2. Louisville Home Telephone Co. v. GasperCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1906
  3. Pugh v. ChesapeakeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1897

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Louisville Gas & Electric Co. v. BeaucondCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1920
  2. May v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1919
  3. City of Indianapolis v. Willis, AdministratorIndiana Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Hatfield v. Sargent's Adm'xCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1948
  5. Lexington & Eastern Railway Co. v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1918

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API