Legal Opinion
Women Involved in Farm Economics v. United States Department of Agriculture
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided June 2, 1989No. 88-5192PublishedCited by 47 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge SILBERMAN.
SILBERMAN, Circuit Judge:
Nearly two decades ago, Congress enacted a per-person limitation on certain payments made to producers under the Agricultural Adjustment Act of 1938 and the Agricultural Act of 1949, as amended, 7 U.S.C. §§ 1281-1469 (1982 & Supp. V 1987). See Agricultural Act of 1970, § 101(1), 84 Stat. 1358, 1358 (1970). In the original payment limitation bill and in subsequent reenactments, Congress delegated to the Secretary of Agriculture the task of promulgating regulations defining the term “person.” See, e.g., id. §…
2Cases cited54 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- Olimpia TOVAR, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, RespondentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- Akers v. McGinnisCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
- United States Telecom Ass'n v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2016
- Northern Air Cargo v. United States Postal ServiceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2012
- Ernest E. Sargent v. Paine Webber Jackson & Curtis, Inc., Ndba as Painewebber IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1989
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.