Legal Opinion

Dartmouth Spinning Co. v. Achord

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided December 2, 1889PublishedCited by 27 opinions

Master and servant. Negligence. Before Judge Roney. Richmond superior court. April term, 1889. Reported in the decision.

1Opinion of the Court

Bleckley, Chief Justice.

According to the declaration, the plaintiff, a skilled carpenter and machinist, erected and put up machinery for the defendant company which he knew was unsafe, as to certain parts of it, for the lack of self-oilers. He knew that no employe could be relied upon to keep it oiled, and that the omission to oil it properly would render it dangerous. He admonished the company of the danger, protested more than once- against the omission to supply the needed self-oilers, and warned the company, even down to the day he was injured, to have the oiling duly attended to. But the…

2Cited by27 opinions

  1. Wood v. Kane Boiler Works, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Fulton Ice & Coal Co. v. PeceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
  3. Huey v. City of AtlantaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1911
  4. Pressly v. Yarn Mills.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  5. Moss v. Central of Georgia RailroadCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API