Legal Opinion · Dissent

Bursey v. South Carolina Department of Health & Environmental Control

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided June 19, 2006No. 26166Published

1DissentJustice Pleicones

I respectfully dissent. In my opinion, the circuit court erred in applying the standard of review found in the Administrative Procedures Act (APA)4 rather than the de novo standard found in S.C.Code Ann. § 18-7-170 (1985). I would therefore vacate both the Court of Appeals’ decision and the circuit court’s order and remand for reconsideration of SCE & G’s appeal.

It is well-settled that a specific statute controls over a more general one, e.g., Capco of Summerville, Inc. v. J.H. Gayle Const. Co., Inc., 368 S.C. 137, 628 S.E.2d 38 (2006), and that a more recent legislative enactment prevails…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Capco of Summerville, Inc. v. J.H. Gayle Construction Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2006
  2. Breland v. Love Chevrolet Olds, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
  3. Town of Duncan v. State Budget & Control Board, Division of Insurance ServicesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1997
  4. Hutto v. Southern Farm Bureau Life InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API