Legal Opinion

Celis v. North Carolina Employment Security Commission

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided March 20, 1990No. 8915SC420PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EAGLES, Judge.

Petitioner makes three arguments on appeal. First, petitioner argues that the Commission’s finding that he left work voluntarily is a conclusion of law that is fully re viewable by this court. Second, petitioner asserts that the appropriate standard of review for decisions of the Commission is “substantial evidence on the whole record,” not the “any competent evidence” standard. Finally, petitioner argues that if we determine that the evidence shows he was discharged, there is no evidence of misconduct or substantial fault on his part to disqualify him from receiving…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Williams v. Burlington Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  2. Torsky v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  3. State Ex Rel. Department of Labor v. Unemployment Insurance Appeal BoardSuperior Court of Delaware · 1972
  4. Dunlap v. Clarke Checks, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989
  5. State ex rel. Employment Security Commission v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cortes v. McDonald's Corp.District Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1996
  2. Graves v. Culp, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
  3. Celis v. NC EMPLOYMENT SEC. COM'NCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API