Legal Opinion

Pothast v. Zimmermann

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided March 18, 1932No. 28153PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDay, J.

This action involves the construction of a will. That part of the will pertinent to the determination is: “Second, I give and bequeath unto my children, Esther, Helen, Annie, Myrtle and the baby, whose name I do not know, the sum of Five Dollars each. Third, I give, bequeath and devise unto my boys Ralph H. Zimmermann and Daniel S. Zimmermann all the rest and residue of my prop'erty, of every name, nature and amount, of which I may die seised or possessed, to be theirs absolutely.” The boy, Daniel S. Zimmermann, named in the above residuary clause, died in 1918, while the testator died in…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Corbett v. SkaggsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1922
  2. Johnson v. SkinnerMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Krause v. KrauseNebraska Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Holbrook v. McClearyIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  5. Darr v. DarrNebraska Supreme Court · 1925

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Bronson v. PinneySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1943
  2. Brandeis v. BrandeisNebraska Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Attebery v. PrenticeNebraska Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Davis v. Mercantile-Safe Deposit & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1964
  5. Goodrich v. BonhamNebraska Supreme Court · 1942

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API