Legal Opinion

Orama v. Oyanguren

Supreme Court of Puerto Rico

Decided March 26, 1913No. 937Published

Appeal from the District Court of San Juan, Section 1. MotioN to correct the record. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Mu. Justice "Wole

delivered tlie opinion of the court.

The respondents appear here and present a motion to correct the record. The motion is unverified but sets up that at the trial in the court below certified copies of the birth records of the respondents were presented. That in such records the respondents, Ana Luisa and Ana Teresa Orama, appear as Ana Luisa Mérida and Ana Teresa Mérida, natural daughters of Fabiana Orama. The respondents allege that in the record offered by the appellant the following is made to appear: “Proof of the complainants. Offered as proof certified copies of the…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Continental Insurance v. RhoadsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Hennessy v. BaconSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  3. Thompson v. RiggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
  4. Pomeroy's Lessee v. State Bank of Ind.Supreme Court of the United States · 1863
  5. Young v. MartinSupreme Court of the United States · 1869

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API