Legal Opinion

Baselice v. Fanoni

New York Supreme Court

Decided August 17, 1945Published

1Opinion of the CourtBotein, J.

This motion presents an interesting question: Can an injured employee now institute an action for malpractice against the physician who allegedly treated and aggravated the original injury, although more than six months ago he received a compensation award for the original injury and although' the alleged malpractice occurred more than a year ago?

The physician defendant here moves to dismiss the employee’s complaint under subdivisions 3 and 6 of rule 107 of the Buies of Civil Practice. The motion is premised upon subdivision 1 of section 29 of the Workmen’s Compensation Law, which reads as…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Milks v. McIverNew York Court of Appeals · 1934
  2. Grossman v. Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1945
  3. Pitkin v. ChapmanNew York Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Ricciardi v. American Export Lines, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1945
  5. Balsley v. SeveranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1941

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API