Legal Opinion
Royal Crown Cola Company v. Hinesly
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided June 22, 1965No. 40905PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WILLIAMS, Justice.
The primary question to be determined is whether Royal Crown Cola Company, employer, authorized Dr. B to treat Paul Worthington Hinesly, claimant.
Claimant was employed by employer as a route salesman. On or about July 11, 1963, as claimant was loading his truck preparatory to going on his route from Tulsa, Oklahoma, he stepped on a broken pop bottle, cutting his right foot through his shoe and penetrating into the sole of the foot approximately three-fourths of an inch.
Claimant testified that at the time of the accident he reported it to J. B. Sellers, vice president in…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Scruggs Bros. & Bill Garage v. State Industrial Com.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- Pine Valley Lumber Co. v. WatsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
- Sapulpa Tank Company v. ColeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963
- GENERAL ACC. FIRE & LIFE ASSUR. CORP. v. MowrySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953
- McAlester v. ToomanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1959
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Mayberry v. Walker's MasonrySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1975
- Sooner Drainboard Co. v. DeatonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1973
- Kerr McGee Corporation v. CroleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1973