Legal Opinion · Dissent

Skanska USA Building Inc. v. Atlantic Yards B2 Owner, LLC

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 20, 2016No. 652680/14Published

1DissentGische, J.

While I am in agreement with most of the majority’s decision, I depart with respect to its conclusion that defendants’ Completion Guaranty is an appropriate undertaking that satisfies the requirements of Lien Law § 5. It is for this reason that I partially dissent and would reinstate subpart (f) of the first cause of action based upon defendants’ alleged failure to post a bond or other undertaking as required by Lien Law § 5.1

The Atlantic Yards Project2 is a sprawling $4.9 billion mixed-use mega-development encompassing 22 acres of underdeveloped public land. The New York State Development…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Federal Deposit Insurance v. Philadelphia Gear Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. West-Fair Electric Contractors v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1995
  3. Dolman v. United States Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1956
  4. Nissho Iwai Europe PLC v. Korea First BankNew York Court of Appeals · 2002
  5. Schwartz v. FeltonNew York Court of Appeals · 1989

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API