Bell v. Dewitt
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Plaintiff appellant, in his application for rehearing, contends that we erred in three particulars, to-wit: 1. In holding that the timber had not been cut by the Lake Superior Piling Company about 1912. 2. In holding that the hardwood timber was merchantable on June 20, 1902, the date of sale from Richard Brown to William L. Jay. 3. In not sustaining the plea of prescription of one year against the claim of the Lake Superior Piling Company.
As to the first two contentions, after a careful review of the record, we find no error committed by us.
As to the third contention, after a careful search…
2Cited by1 opinion
- Parker v. AllumsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1955