Legal Opinion

Pitaresi v. Appello

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided January 8, 1952PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

17 N.J. Super. 278 (1952)

85 A.2d 829

ROSE PITARESI, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS,

v.

GRACE APPELLO, EXECUTRIX, ETC., ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Hudson County Court Law Division.

Decided January 8, 1952.

Mr. Dominick R. Rinaldi, attorney for plaintiffs (Mr. Alfred Brenner, of counsel).

Mr. Emil W.A. Schumann, attorney for defendants.

PROCTOR, J.S.C.

For the purpose of expediting the trial of the above cause, by settling in advance whether the plaintiffs have a cause of action, it was agreed that the plaintiffs' attorney would make the following opening to the court:

"On November 2nd, 1948,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Carlo v. the Okonite-Callender Cable Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1949
  2. Evers v. DavisSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1914
  3. Rupp v. BurgessSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1903
  4. Gleason v. BoehmSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1896
  5. Gillvon v. ReillySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1887

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Taneian v. MeghrigianNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1953
  2. Pitaresi v. AppelloNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API