Legal Opinion

McClellan v. Duncombe

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 15, 1900PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal by- the defendant, Naomi Buncombe, from a judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the plaintiffs, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Westchester on the 29th day •of July, 1899, upon the report of a referee.

1Opinion of the Court

Willard Bartlett, J.:

The defendant is the widow and was the second wife of Alfred H. Buncombe. She acquired almost all his estate, either by gift -during his lifetime or by will upon his death. • Soon after Mr. Buncombe’s decease, Mrs. Adeline Williams, his daughter by a former marriage, instituted suits to set aside Lié transfers of property to the defendant. Mrs. Williams also contested her father’s will. The plaintiffs are engaged in the real estate and insurance business. They have recovered $3,302.25 in this action for services ■alleged to have been rendered to the defendant in…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Radway v. DuffyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
  2. McClellan v. DuncombeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API