Legal Opinion

In Re Gawerc

Texas Supreme Court

Decided May 27, 2005No. 04-1044PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

In this original habeas corpus proceeding, petitioner Jim Gawerc contends his civil contempt imprisonment is illegal because he is unable to post the $50,000 child support bond required for his release. Because Gawerc conclusively established his inability to comply, we order his release.

The trial court held Gawerc in criminal and civil contempt for failing to comply with the trial court’s child support modification order that required Gawerc to pay $750 in child support and post a $50,000 child support bond. 1 The trial court then ordered Gawerc to pay $2,400 in attorney’s fees and suspended…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ex Parte RohlederTexas Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Ex Parte RojoTexas Supreme Court · 1996

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Sickler v. SicklerNebraska Supreme Court · 2016
  2. in Re Kristina Shea Cook, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2018
  3. in Re: Jose T. Coronado, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API