Legal Opinion
Graves v. Cas Medical Systems, Inc.
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided December 12, 2012No. 27168PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hearn
India Graves, a six-month-old girl, died while being monitored by one of CAS Medical Systems’ products. India’s parents, Kareem and Tara Graves, subsequently filed a products liability lawsuit against CAS, contending the monitor was defectively designed and failed to alert them when India’s heart rate and breathing slowed. The circuit court granted CAS’s motion to exclude all of the Graves’ expert witnesses and accordingly granted CAS summary judgment. We affirm as modified.
FACTUAL/PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
India and her sisters, Asia and Paris, were triplets born prematurely to Kareem and Tara.…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- MacK Trucks, Inc. v. TamezTexas Supreme Court · 2006
- Westberry v. Gislaved Gummi ABCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999
- State v. PaganSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2006
- Clayton W. Clark v. Takata Corporation, American Honda Motor Co., Inc., Honda Motor Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
- State v. CouncilSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- State v. GreeneSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2018
- Riley v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2014
- State v. MealorCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2018
- State v. SimpsonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2019
- Eichin v. Covidien LPDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2024
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.