Dorsey v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
ERVIN, Judge.
Dorsey’s appeal from his conviction for unlawful possession of more than five grams of cannabis urges that the lower court erred in failing to grant his motion for judgment of acquittal since the state failed to prove the cannabis, after excluding non-prohibited stems and stalks,1 was in excess of five grams. He relies upon Purifoy v. State, supra note 1, which held that the state has the burden of proving that the quantity found in a defendant’s possession must exceed five grams after stems and stalks have been removed. We conclude the state met its burden and that the facts in…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Purifoy v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1978
- Ansley v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1974
- Wright v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977
3Cited by3 opinions
- Williams v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979
- Sims v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
- Leavitt v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979