Legal Opinion
In re All Assessments
Court of Appeals of Tennessee
Decided September 14, 2001PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court 1
OPINION
2Opinion of the Court · CainWilliam B. Cain, J.
in which BEN H. CANTRELL, P.J., M.S. and WILLIAM C. KOCH, JR, J, joined.
In these consolidated cases, a consortium of counties and cities appeals the actions of the Tennessee State Board of Equalization in reducing public utility assessments by fifteen per cent. Acknowledging that all sub-constitutional issues involved in the cases have been foreclosed by the decision of the Tennessee Supreme Court in In Re: All Assessments 1998, 58 S.W.3d 95 (Tenn.2000), Appellants challenge the constitutionality of Tennessee Code Annotated section 67-5-903(f) and section 67-5-1302(b)(1). We hold both…
3Cases cited31 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- New York v. FerberSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Commissioner v. Estate of BoschSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by4 opinions
- State of Tennessee v. Michael Shane SpringerTennessee Supreme Court · 2013
- Wilson v. BredesenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
- Williamson County v. Tennessee State Board of EqualizationCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2001
- Hallysah Ibsen as Administrator of the Estate of Elaine Kelly, and Robert Kelly v. Summit View of Farragut, LLCCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2019