Legal Opinion

Trustees of C.I. Mortgage Group v. City Housing Corp.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 22, 1982No. 80-2088PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LETTS, Chief Judge.

This case should not have been decided by the entry of a summary judgment. There remain many unresolved material issues of fact. We reverse.

The original mortgages held by the Bank were extended by a mutual written agreement which specified that two additional parcels (3 and 4) would be covered by the mortgages. Allegedly by clerical mistake and inadvertence, the actual descriptions of these two additional parcels were omitted from the appellant’s document actually recorded in the public records. Because of this omission and a stipulation with the Bank that the Bank’s…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Lasar Mfg. Co., Inc. v. BachanovDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
  2. Huntington Nat. Bank v. Merrill LynchDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
  3. Gee v. U.S. Bank National Ass'nDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
  4. Gee v. US BANK NAT. ASS'NDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API